Hello Dr. Sher.
I have a question about the Agonist/Antagonist Conversion protocol
I am to start this protocol, and I wonder if it matters if I use Menopur or Gonal-F/Follistim during the stimulation? The reason for this question is that I have done 7 stimulation cycles, and in two of them, I was put on Gonal-F, and they both failed to yield any eggs, and the follicles grew slowly. The doctor I am currently seeing put me on the second round of gonal-F the first week. Then it changed to pergoveris for a few days, and then back to Gonal-F and Meriofert. Slow growing follicles, and no eggs.
I told him that I would rather not be put on this medication again, as it seems to be a proven failure with me. He has suggested our next stimulation be an Agonist/Antagonist Conversion protocol, and that seems promising on paper. Untill I read the list of medications, where he wants me on follistim, witch is the same as Gonal-F, just with a different name, and a very small dose of menopur.
So my question is with this protocol, that I understand might help syncronise my follical growth, and hopefully get a more syncronised growth, is it a good reason to use Gonal-F or follistim instead of just 300iu menopur from the start?
Ask Our Doctors
Supporting Your Journey
Our Medical Directors are outstanding physicians that you will find to be very personable and compassionate, who take care to ensure that you have the most cutting-edge fertility treatments at your disposal. This is your outlet to ask your questions to the doctors.
-
Dear Patients,
I created this forum to welcome any questions you have on the topic of infertility, IVF, conception, testing, evaluation, or any related topics. I do my best to answer all questions in less than 24 hours. I know your question is important and, in many cases, I will answer within just a few hours. Thank you for taking the time to trust me with your concern.– Geoffrey Sher, MD
Fill in the following information and we’ll get back to you.
Agonist/Antagonist Conversion protocol-meds
Name: Liz S
Embarking on the journey of in vitro fertilization (IVF) can be a daunting experience especially for women with sub-normal AMH levels (diminished ovarian reserve -DOR). Here is a novel and highly effective protocol known as the Agonist/Antagonist Conversion Protocol (A/ACP), designed to optimize the chances of success for women facing this challenge.
Let’s dive into the details of this innovative ovarian stimulation protocol :
The A/ACP – An Overview
The A/ACP is a carefully structured treatment plan that combines the use of monophasic birth control pills (BCP) with advanced hormonal therapies to enhance follicular development in women with DOR. Here’s a step-by-step breakdown of how it works:
- BCP Initiation: The treatment begins on days 1 to 5 of a selected menstrual cycle with monophasic birth control pills such as Orthonovum 1/35, Desogen, Marvelon, Lo-Estrin, or Lo-Ovral. The duration of BCP use should be at least 8 days. To mitigate the slightly increased risk of thromboembolism associated with BCP, patients are advised to take a daily baby aspirin (81mg) daily while taking the BCP.
- Human Growth Hormone(HGH: After at least 8 days of BCP, patients start receiving daily subcutaneous injections of human growth hormone (Omnitrope 20U). This hormone likely augments follicular growth and egg development.
- GnRH-Agonist Phase: The next phase involves the addition of daily subcutaneous injections of a gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist -GnRHa (10U Lupron). This phase continues until menstruation begins, typically within 5-7 days after discontinuing BCP. At the point that menstruation ensues, a vaginal ultrasound and blood estradiol (E2) measurement is done to to make sure that there are no ovarian cysts and that the blood E2 concentration is < 70pg/ ml ( <200pmol/L) so that ovarian stimulation can commence.
- Baseline ultrasound and blood E2 measurement: If a functional ovarian cyst is detected, the Lupron can be continued for as long as it takes to resolve or ( alternatively/preferably) the cyst can be drained under local anesthesia through transvaginal needle aspiration. This usually ensures that E2 levels rapidly drop to below baseline ( 70pg/ml) and menstruation occurs promptly.
- Transition to GnRH-Antagonist and Gonadotropins: At the onset of menstruation, the protocol transitions to a critical phase:
- Switch to GnRH-Antagonist ( e.g., Ganirelix, Cetrotide, or Orgalutron): Leuprolide is replaced with daily subcutaneous injections of 250mcg GnRH antagonist.
- Continued Hormonal Support: Daily administration of human growth hormone continues and gonadotropin injections are initiated.
3 Day 1: FSHr (e.g., Follistim, Gonal-F, Puregon, Fostimon (____) + Menopur 75u are administered daily for 2 days.
4 Day 3: FSHr dosage is decreased to ___u while Menopur 75u daily continues. . This regimen continues until the hCG “trigger.”
5 Daily Ultrasound and blood E2 monitoring commences 6-7 days after initiating gonadotropin injections through daily daily ultrasound and plasma estradiol (E2) assessments which are crucial during this phase to gauge follicle growth and development.
6 Timing the hCG “Trigger”: The A/ACP can result in falsely understated blood E2 levels. Therefore, this protocol prioritizes follicular size to determine when the hCG “trigger” should be administered.
- Who Benefits from the A/ACP? The A/ACP is specifically tailored for women with diminished ovarian reserve (DOR). It aims to counteract the suppressive effects of conventional long pituitary agonist down-regulation protocols, which can be less effective for this group. However, it’s essential to note that the A/ACP may not be suitable for individuals who have severe DOR ( i.e., have reduced basal AMH levels, irregular ovulation, PCOS, or those prone to severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS), as accurate E2 measurements are crucial in all such
- The hCG “Trigger” and Beyond: The final stage involves the hCG “trigger,” which is a single intramuscular injection of 10,000u Pregnyl, Profasi, Novarel, or 500mcg Ovidrel. Simultaneously, human growth hormone, gonadotropin administration, and GnRH antagonist administration cease on the day of the hCG “trigger.” Prophylactic oral antibiotics ( e.g., 500mg Ciprofloxin twice daily) are initiated to prevent infection-related complications.
- Moving to egg retrieval (ER): Roughly 36h following the “trigger” , an ER is conducted ( usually under conscious sedation) under the supervision of a qualified anesthesiologist.
- Preimplantation Genetic Screening/ Testing for embryo aneuploidy(PGS/PGTa):For patients opting for PGS/PGTa, blastocyst biopsy is performed on day 5-6 blastocysts, and the specimens are sent for next-generation gene sequencing (NGS) chromosomal karyotype f. Depending on chromosomal integrity, normal ( euploid) and “ mosaic” embryos can be transferred in subsequent cycles.
- Hormonal Support and Embryo Transfer (ET):Hormonal support with intramuscular progesterone in oil (PIO), or vaginal progesterone suppositories ( e.g.,Crinone 8% ——for those that cannot tolerate PIO, can be used. Also. estrogen supplementation can be administered to try and optimize the chance of a successful ET.
In conclusion, the A/ACP is a novel and highly effective approach to ovarian stimulation for IVF, designed to optimize IVF outcomes for women with DOR. While it requires meticulous monitoring and may not be suitable for all patients, it is a potentially beneficial addition to the therapeutic armamentarium.
FET:
Two decades ago, when women went through IVF (in vitro fertilization), they usually had their embryos put in the uterus right after the eggs were collected in the same cycle (known as “Fresh” Embryo Transfer). Freezing embryos at that time was risky, with about 30% not surviving the process, and those that did had lower chances of successfully implanting and growing a healthy pregnancy compared to fresh embryos. This was because the slow freezing process led to ice forming within the embryo’s cells, harming them.
But things changed with a new, faster freezing method called vitrification. With vitrification, embryos are frozen so quickly that ice crystals don’t have a chance to form. More than 90% of embryos survive this process in excellent condition, just like they were before freezing, giving them a better chance to develop into healthy pregnancies.
Modern advancements in frozen embryo transfers (FET) have shown great promise, possibly even surpassing the success rates of transferring “fresh” embryos. This improvement likely isn’t because of the freezing process itself, but rather due to two key factors:
- a) FET often involves transferring blastocysts that have been carefully tested and selected through preimplantation genetic screening (PGS)/preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy ( PGT-A) , increasing the chances of a successful pregnancy compared to “fresh” transfers where such selection is not done.
- b) The hormone replacement therapy (HRT) used for FET helps prepare the uterus optimally for implantation, improving the overall conditions for a healthy pregnancy compared to the ovarian stimulation with fertility drugs used in Fresh IVF cycles.
Considering these factors, FET offers several clear advantages:
- Safe storage of extra embryos for future transfers.
- Flexibility to delay transfers for additional testing or to avoid complications.
- Preserving embryos for selective transfer in cases of advanced maternal age or diminished ovarian reserve (DOR).
- Convenience in assisted reproductive services involving third-party parenting, like egg donation or gestational surrogacy.
These advancements provide hope and options for couples seeking successful IVF journeys and healthy outcomes for growing families.
The advent of PGS/PGT heralded a major advance in IVF as it enables us to choose the healthiest embryos for transfer to the uterus, thereby significantly boosting the chances of a successful pregnancy. The performance of PGS/PGTA virtually mandates that advanced embryos ( blastocysts) be biopsied 5-6 days after fertilization and that an additional period of 10 days be allowed for genetic testing to be performed. It follows that such blastocysts be vitrified and stored for FET to be performed in a later cycle.
For women who are older or have a lower number of eggs (diminished ovarian reserve-DOR ), as well as those who have faced repeated pregnancy loss or IVF failure, PGS/ PGT-A can be a game-changer. It helps identify the best embryos for successful transfer. However, for younger women who tend to have normal egg reserves, and because of their youth produce a larger number of quality eggs/ embryos the benefits of PGS might not be necessary.
When it comes to creating a reserve of embryos through “Embryo Banking,” FET is mandatory and ground-breaking. Here, multiple IVF cycles are conducted over an extended period of time allowing for the collection and banking of a good number of advanced ( usually PGS/PGT-A tested) embryos ( blastocysts) for future dispensation. Once we’ve gathered a promising group of such embryos, well-timed FETs can be undertaken, significantly improving the chances of a successful pregnancy and reducing the risk of miscarriage.
Through these advancements, we are able to offer greater hope and possibilities to those on their journey to parenthood, making IVF an even more effective and accessible option.
Let’s break down the process to prepare the uterus for a frozen embryo transfer (FET) in simpler terms:
- Cycle Start: To begin, the recipient takes birth control pills (like Marvelon, Desogen ,Lo-Estrin etc.,)for about 10 days. The patient commences 0.75mg Dexamethasone daily OR 10mg prednisone BID at cycle start. This is continued to the 10th week of pregnancy (tailed off from the 8th to 10th week) or as soon as pregnancy is ruled out
- Hormone Kickstart: After 10 days, they start another medication called Lupron/Lucrin/decapeptyl/ Superfact/ Buserelin through a shot.
- Monitoring Progress: The doctors keep an eye on the progress by doing ultrasounds and blood tests to make sure things are on track.
- Boosting Hormones: Delestrogen 4mg IM is injected, twice weekly (on Tuesday and Friday), commencing within a few days of Lupron/Lucrin/Superfact, Decapeptyl-induced menstruation. Blood is drawn on Monday and Thursday for measurement of blood [E2]. This allows for planned adjustment of the E2V dosage scheduled for the next day. The objective is to achieve a plasma E2 concentration of 500-1,000pg/ml and an endometrial lining of >8mm, as assessed by ultrasound examination done after 10 days of estrogen exposure i.e., a day after the 3rd dosage of Delestrogen. The twice weekly, final (adjusted) dosage of E2V is continued until the 10th week of pregnancy or until pregnancy is discounted by blood testing or by an ultrasound examination. Dexamethasone/Prednisone is 0.75 mg is taken (as above) and oral folic acid (1 mg) is taken daily commencing with the first E2V injection and is continued throughout gestation.
- Antibiotic prophylaxis: Patients also receive Ciprofloxin 500mg BID orally starting with the initiation of Progesterone therapy and continuing for 10 days.
- Luteal support: commences on day-1 , 6 days prior to the FET, with intramuscular progesterone in oil (PIO) at an initial dose of 75-100 mg (-Day 1). Daily administration- is continued until late in the evening of Day 5 ( I suggest 10.00PM-11.00PM) . Daily PIO (75mg-100mg) is continued until the 10th week of pregnancy, or until a blood pregnancy test/negative ultrasound (after the 6-7th gestational week), discounts a viable pregnancy. Also, commencing on the day following the FET, the patient inserts one (1) vaginal progesterone suppository (100 mg) in the morning + 2mg E2V vaginal suppository (in the evening) and this is continued until the 10th week of pregnancy or until pregnancy is discounted by blood testing or by an ultrasound examination after the 6-7th gestational week.
- Timing the FET: This is performed as early as possible on the morning of Day-6
- Blood pregnancy Testing: Blood pregnancy tests are performed 13 days and 15 days after the first PIO injection was given
*Note: In cases where intramuscular progesterone administration is not well tolerated, we tend to use a vaginal gel known as Crinone8%. This gel is used twice a day (morning and evening) until the day of the embryo transfer.
- Preparing for Transfer: On the morning of the embryo transfer, we pause using the gel but resume it in the evening. The day after the transfer, we continue using the gel twice a day. . If the blood pregnancy tests show a positive result and 2-3 weeks later an ultrasound examination confirms a viable pregnancy, the Crinone 8% gel is continued twice daily up to the 10th week of pregnancy
Regime for Thawing and Transferring Cryopreserved Embryos/Blastocysts:
Patients undergoing FET with cryopreserved embryos/ blastocysts will have their embryos thawed and transferred by the following regimen.
| Day 2 (P4) | Day 6 (P4) | |
| PN | Thaw | ET |
| Day 3 Embryo | Thaw | ET |
| Blastocysts frozen on day 5 post-ER | Thaw-FET | |
| Blastocysts frozen on day 6, post-ER | Thaw-FET |
- Monitoring Pregnancy: Regular check-ups and tests are done to confirm if the pregnancy is successful.
I hope this helps!
Geoff Sher
Please contact my assistant, Patti at concierge@sherivf.com if you would like to have an online consultation with me to discuss in depth.
Reoccurring GeneticRisk
Name: Kim S
I am turning 41 in a couple weeks and unfortunately just had to make the heart wrenching choice to medically terminate our Trisomy 21 pregnancy at 13 weeks. Two years ago, I had a miscarriage/ D&C due to Trisomy 10. My husband is 38 years old and we have 3 healthy children. We never had an issue getting pregnant and always got pregnant the first month of trying … even this last time at age 40 years old we got pregnant in one month. I have had 3 prior c-sections and during this D&E the surgeon mentioned briefly seeing a uterine niche – she was unsure if it covered my complete scar or a small portion, but wanted to make note of it. I am struggling with thinking this is the end of my pregnancy journey. My husband and I still yearn for a 4th child and I don’t want my journey to stop here. However, I have mixed feelings about IVF genetic testing – finding good doctors in my area may be difficult and traveling to neighboring areas might be a bit tricky for us – the costs associated with IVF- and also the spiritual part of having additional embryos in storage that may go unused & all of it seems a little overwhelming … however, I am afraid if we try naturally again we will end up on a similar position with a genetic issue again. I have read about taking Coq10 … but just confused where to turn and how concerned I should be about the uterine niche and 4th c-section & a recurring genetic issue. Can lighting continue to strike? Or just a bad cluster of bad luck? My next step was to rule out we are carriers of anything and get some genetic testing done through Natera- but assuming that comes back ok- what would you guide me to do?
Thank you,
Kim
Author
The cause of your trisomy pregnancy was likely age-related egg aneuploidy. The chance of an embryo having the right chromosomal configuration declines with with advancing age. Since you already have several children, you might want to stop. However, since you et pregnant quite easily on your own, and seem intent on having another baby , perhaps you should keep trying on your own and if you do conceive, get tested in the 1st trimester using chorionic villus sampling (CVS) or in the 2nd trimester by amniocentesis to establish the fetal chromosomal integrity..
IVF with PGTA (to test the chromosomal integrity of the embryo) is the only way to minimize the risk of having another aneuploid pregnancy.
Good luck!
Geoff Sher
PS: If interested, email my assistant, Patti Converse at concierge@sherivf.vom and she will set you up with an online consultation so we can discuss your situation in depth.
Reproductive Immunology
Name: Kathryn C
Hello,
I have had two, late, second trimester losses, back to back. Both of these losses have happened since I was diagnosed with a rare autoimmune, eosinophillic esophagitis.
What is your familiarity with reproductive immunology and how likely is there a correlation between diagnosis of autoimmune disease and miscarriage?
Author
In the world of assisted reproduction, when IVF fails repeatedly or without explanation, it’s often assumed that poor embryo quality is the main culprit. However, this view oversimplifies the situation. The process of embryo implantation, which begins about six or seven days after fertilization, involves a complex interaction between embryonic cells and the lining of the uterus. These specialized cells, called trophoblasts, eventually become the placenta. When the trophoblasts meet the uterine lining, they engage in a communication process with immune cells through hormone-like substances called cytokines. This interaction plays a critical role in supporting the successful growth of the embryo. From the earliest stages, the trophoblasts establish the foundation for the exchange of nutrients, hormones, and oxygen between the mother and the baby. The process of implantation not only ensures the survival of early pregnancy but also contributes to the quality of life after birth.
There are numerous uterine factors that can impede embryo implantation potential. However, the vast majority relate to the following three (3) factors:
- Thin uterine lining (endometrium) . A lining that is <8mm in thickness at the time of ovulation, and/ or the administration of progesterone
- Irregularity the inner surface of the uterine cavity (caused by protruding sub-mucous fibroids, scar tissue or polyps )
- Immunologic factors that compromise implantation
Of these 3 factors, the one most commonly overlooked (largely because of the highly complex nature of the problem) is immunologic implantation dysfunction (IID), a common cause of “unexplained (often repeated) IVF failure and recurrent pregnancy loss. This article will focus on the one that most commonly is overlooked ….namely, immunologic implantation dysfunction (IID.
There is a growing recognition that problems with the immune function in the uterus can lead to embryo implantation dysfunction. The failure of proper immunologic interaction during implantation has been implicated as a cause of recurrent miscarriage, late pregnancy fetal loss, IVF failure, and infertility. Some immunologic factors that may contribute to these issues include antiphospholipid antibodies (APA), antithyroid antibodies (ATA) , and activated natural killer cells (NKa).
- Activated natural Killer Cells (NKa):
During ovulation and early pregnancy, the uterine lining is frequented by NK cells and T-cells, which together make up more than 80% of the immune cells in the uterine lining. These cells travel from the bone marrow to the endometrium where they proliferate under hormonal regulation. When exposed to progesterone, they produce TH-1 and TH-2 cytokines. TH-2 cytokines help the trophoblast (embryo’s “root system”) to penetrate the uterine lining, while TH-1 cytokines induce apoptosis (cell suicide), limiting placental development to the inner part of the uterus. The balance between TH1 and TH-2 cytokines is crucial for optimal placental development. NK cells and T-cells contribute to cytokine production. Excessive TH-1 cytokine production is harmful to the trophoblast and endometrial cells, leading to programmed cell death and ultimately to implantation failure.
Functional NK cells reach their highest concentration in the endometrium around 6-7 days after ovulation or exposure to progesterone, which coincides with the time of embryo implantation.
It’s important to note that measuring the concentration of blood NK cells doesn’t reflect NK cell activation (NKa). The activation of NK cells is what matters. In certain conditions like endometriosis, the blood concentration of NK cells may be below normal, but NK cell activation is significantly increased.
There are several laboratory methods to assess NK cell activation (cytotoxicity), including immunohistochemical assessment of uterine NK cells and measuring TH-1 cytokines in the uterus or blood. However, the K-562 target cell blood test remains the gold standard. In this test, NK cells isolated from a woman’s blood are incubated with specific “target cells,” and the percentage of killed target cells is quantified. More than 12% killing indicates a level of NK cell activation that usually requires treatment. Currently, there are only a few Reproductive Immunology Reference Laboratories in the USA capable of reliably performing the K-562 target cell test.
There is a common misconception that adding IL (intralipid) or IVIg to NK cells can immediately downregulate NK cell activity. However, IL and IVIg cannot significantly suppress already activated NK cells. They are believed to work by regulating NK cell progenitors, which then produce downregulated NK cells. To assess the therapeutic effect, IL/IVIg infusion should be done about 14 days before embryos are transferred to the uterus to ensure a sufficient number of normal functional NK cells are present at the implantation site during embryo transfer. Failure to recognize this reality has led to the erroneous demand from IVF doctors for Reproductive Immunology Reference Laboratories to report on NK cell activity before and immediately after exposure to IVIg or IL at different concentrations. However, since already activated NK cells cannot be deactivated in the laboratory, assessing NKa suppression in this way has little clinical benefit. Even if blood is drawn 10-14 days after IL/IVIg treatment, it would take another 10-14 days to receive the results, which would be too late to be practically advantageous.
- Antiphospholipid Antibodies:
Many women who struggle with IVF failure or recurrent pregnancy loss, as well as those with a personal or family history of autoimmune diseases like lupus erythematosus, rheumatoid arthritis, scleroderma, and dermatomyositis, often test positive for antiphospholipid antibodies (APAs). Over 30 years ago, I proposed a treatment for women with positive APA tests. This involved using a low dose of heparin to improve the success of IVF implantation and increase birth rates. Research indicated that heparin could prevent APAs from affecting the embryo’s “root system” ( the trophoblast), thus enhancing implantation. We later discovered that this therapy only benefits women whose APAs target specific phospholipids (phosphatidylethanolamine and phosphatidylserine). Nowadays, longer-acting low molecular weight heparinoids like Lovenox and Clexane have replaced heparin.
- Antithyroid Antibodies ( thyroid peroxidase -TPO and antithyroglobulin antibodies (TGa)
Between 2% and 5% of women of the childbearing age have reduced thyroid hormone activity (hypothyroidism). Women with hypothyroidism often manifest with reproductive failure i.e., infertility, unexplained (often repeated) IVF failure, or recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL). The condition is 5-10 times more common in women than in men. In most cases hypothyroidism is caused by damage to the thyroid gland resulting from thyroid autoimmunity (Hashimoto’s disease) caused by damage done to the thyroid gland by antithyroglobulin and antimicrosomal auto-antibodies. The increased prevalence of hypothyroidism and thyroid autoimmunity (TAI) in women is likely the result of a combination of genetic factors, estrogen-related effects, and chromosome X abnormalities. This having been said, there is significantly increased incidence of thyroid antibodies in non-pregnant women with a history of infertility and recurrent pregnancy loss and thyroid antibodies can be present asymptomatically in women without them manifesting with overt clinical or endocrinologic evidence of thyroid disease. In addition, these antibodies may persist in women who have suffered from hyper- or hypothyroidism even after normalization of their thyroid function by appropriate pharmacological treatment. The manifestations of reproductive dysfunction thus seem to be linked more to the presence of thyroid autoimmunity (TAI) than to clinical existence of hypothyroidism and treatment of the latter does not routinely result in a subsequent improvement in reproductive performance. It follows that if antithyroid autoantibodies are associated with reproductive dysfunction they may serve as useful markers for predicting poor outcome in patients undergoing assisted reproductive technologies. Some years back, I reported on the fact that 47% of women who harbor thyroid autoantibodies, regardless of the absence or presence of clinical hypothyroidism, have activated uterine natural killer cells (NKa) cells and cytotoxic lymphocytes (CTL) and that such women often present with reproductive dysfunction. We demonstrated that appropriate immunotherapy with IVIG or intralipid (IL) and steroids subsequently often results in a significant improvement in reproductive performance in such cases.
Almost 50% of women with antithyroid antibodies do not have activated cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTL) or natural killer cells (NK cells). This suggests that the antibodies themselves may not be the direct cause of reproductive dysfunction. Instead, the activation of CTL and NK cells, which occurs in about half of the cases with thyroid autoimmunity (TAI), is likely an accompanying phenomenon that damages the early “root system” (trophoblast) of the embryo during implantation.
Treating women who have both antithyroid antibodies and activated NK cells/CTL with intralipid (IL) and steroids improves their chances of successful reproduction. However, women with antithyroid antibodies who do not have activated NK cells/CTL do not require this treatment.
- Treatment Options for Immunologic Implantation Dysfunction (IID):
- Intralipid (IL) Therapy: IL is a mixture of soybean lipid droplets in water, primarily used for providing nutrition. When administered intravenously, IL supplies essential fatty acids that can activate certain receptors in NK cells, reducing their cytotoxic activity and enhancing implantation. IL, combined with corticosteroids, suppresses the overproduction of pro-inflammatory cytokines by NK cells, improving reproductive outcomes. IL is cost-effective and has fewer side effects compared to other treatments like IVIg.
- Intravenous immunoglobulin-G (IVIg) Therapy: In the past, IVIg was used to down-regulate activated NK cells. However, concerns about viral infections and the high cost led to a decline in its use. IVIg can be effective, but IL has become a more favorable and affordable alternative.
- Corticosteroid Therapy: Corticosteroids, such as prednisone and dexamethasone, are commonly used in IVF treatment. They have an immunomodulatory effect and reduce TH-1 cytokine production by CTL. When combined with IL or IVIg, corticosteroids enhance the implantation process. Treatment typically starts 10-14 days before embryo transfer and continues until the 10th week of pregnancy.
- Heparinoid Therapy: Low molecular weight heparin (Clexane, Lovenox) can improve IVF success rates in women with antiphospholipid antibodies (APAs) and may prevent pregnancy loss in certain thrombophilias when used during treatment. It is administered subcutaneously once daily from the start of ovarian stimulation.
- TH-1 Cytokine Blockers (Enbrel, Humira): TH-1 cytokine blockers have limited effectiveness in the IVF setting and, in my opinion, no compelling evidence supports their use. They may have a role in treating threatened miscarriage caused by CTL/NK cell activation, but not for IVF treatment. TH-1 cytokines are needed for cellular response, during the early phase of implantation, so completely blocking them could hinder normal implantation.
- Baby Aspirin and IVF: Baby aspirin doesn’t offer much value in treating implantation dysfunction (IID) and may even reduce the chance of success. This is because aspirin thins the blood and increases the risk of bleeding, which can complicate procedures like egg retrieval or embryo transfer during IVF, potentially compromising its success.
- Leukocyte Immunization Therapy (LIT): LIT involves injecting the male partner’s lymphocytes into the mother to improve the recognition of the embryo as “self” and prevent rejection. LIT can up-regulate Treg cells and down-regulate NK cell activation, improving the balance of TH-1 and TH-2 cells in the uterus. However, the same benefits can be achieved through IL (Intralipid) therapy combined with corticosteroids. IL is more cost-effective, and the use of LIT is prohibited by law in the USA.
Types of Immunologic Implantation Dysfunction (IID) and NK Cell Activation:
- Autoimmune Implantation Dysfunction: Women with a personal or family history of autoimmune conditions like Rheumatoid arthritis, Lupus Erythematosus, thyroid autoimmune disease (Hashimoto’s disease and thyrotoxicosis), and endometriosis (in about one-third of cases) may experience autoimmune IID. However, autoimmune IID can also occur without any personal or family history of autoimmune diseases.Treatment for NK cell activation in IVF cases complicated by autoimmune IID involves a combination of daily oral dexamethasone from the start of ovarian stimulation until the 10th week of pregnancy, along with 20% intralipid (IL) infusion 10 days to 2 weeks before embryo transfer. With this treatment, the chance of a viable pregnancy occurring within two completed embryo transfer attempts is approximately 70% for women <40 years old who have normal ovarian reserve.
- Alloimmune Implantation Dysfunction: NK cell activation occurs when the uterus is exposed to an embryo that shares certain genotypic (HLA/DQ alpha) similarities with the embryo recipient.
- Partial DQ alpha/HLA genetic matching: Couples who share only one DQ alpha/HLA gene are considered to have a “partial match.” If NK cell activation is also present, this partial match puts the couple at a disadvantage for IVF success. However, it’s important to note that DQ alpha/HLA matching, whether partial or total, does not cause IID without associated NK cell activation. Treatment for partial DQ alpha/HLA match with NK cell activation involves IL infusion and oral prednisone as adjunct therapy. IL infusion is repeated every 2-4 weeks after pregnancy is confirmed and continued until the 24th week of gestation. In these cases, only one embryo is transferred at a time to minimize the risk of NK cell activation.
- Total (Complete) Alloimmune Genetic Matching: A total alloimmune match occurs when the husband’s DQ alpha genotype matches both that of the partner. Although rare, this total match along with NK cell activation significantly reduces the chance of a viable pregnancy resulting in a live birth at term. In some cases, the use of a gestational surrogate may be necessary.
It should be emphasized that poor embryo quality is not always the main cause of reproductive dysfunction and that the complex interaction between embryonic cells and the lining of the uterus plays a critical role in successful implantation. Women with personal or family histories of autoimmune disease or endometriosis and those with unexplained (often repeated) IVF failure or recurrent pregnancy loss, often have immunologic implantation dysfunction (IID as the underlying cause . For such women, it is important to understand how IID leads to reproductive failure and how selective treatment options such as intralipid (IL), corticosteroid and heparinoid therapy, can dramatically improve reproductive outcomes. Finally, there is real hope that proper identification and management of IID can significantly improve the chance of successful reproduction and ultimately contribute to better quality of life after birth.
Feel free to email my assistant, Patti (concierge@sherivf.com if you wish to discuss your case with me online.
Geoff Sher
High testosterone during hormone suppression prior to fet
Name: Holly Fleming
Hi
I am currently doing suppression before embryo transfer. I am almost 2 month into suppression with lupron depot, letrozole, and norethindrone. I had done 2 months of suppression with just lupron about 6 months ago before a transfer that failed. I just had bloodwork done and my estrogen, lh, and fsh are all low but my testosterone was 140! I had it retested and now its 157! Im not taking Dhea or and supplements that would cause that and i dont have pcos. I have endometriosis and dor. What could be causing this? What should i do next? I have to decide if i should take a 3rd month dose but im not sure what to do.
Thank you.
Author
A high testosterone has an adverse effect on egg/embryo quality and endometriosis can adversely affect embryo attachment (implantation) through an immune mechanism.
Feel free to email my assistant, Patti (concierge@sherivf.com if you wish to discuss your case with me online.
Geoff Sher
DOR,age,IVF
Name: Maja S
Hello, dear doctor. Listened to you podcast and been blown away by your expertise! I am a youthful 45 year old trying to get pregnant. Gotten pregnant 2 years ago naturally, but miscarried in week 9. Had done 3 IVF since. First with birth control, menopur (300 IU), cetrotide from day 4 stimm., HcG trigger. Got 2 follicles, 2 eggs, one embryo (transferred day3). Did not implant. Second IVF birth control, gonal F (300 IU), cetrotide from day 4 stimm, Hcg trigger. Got 4 follicles, 2 ovulated before retrieval, got 1 egg, one was “empty”, fertilised with 2 sperms. Third IVF with letrozole, menopur (300 IU), cetrotide from day 4 stimm, HcG trigger. Had 3 follicles, that were growing very slowly and NO eggs retrieved – all said to be “emptly” follicles. I have to mention I am a vet, so the injections are done properly. I just feel that there is a baby for me in my future and that the protocols are not tailored to my needs. What would you use on me and what do you suggest I discuss with my doctor? Should I do some additional testing? Thank you sooooo much.With love, Maja
Author
Understanding the impact of age and ovarian reserve on the success of in vitro fertilization (IVF) is crucial when it comes to reproductive health. This article aims to simplify and clarify these concepts, emphasizing their significance in the selection of ovarian stimulation protocols for IVF. By providing you with this information, we hope to shed light on the importance of considering these factors and making informed decisions regarding fertility treatments.
- The Role of Eggs in Chromosomal Integrity: In the process of creating a healthy embryo, it is primarily the egg that determines the chromosomal integrity, which is crucial for the embryo’s competency. A competent egg possesses a normal karyotype, increasing the chances of developing into a healthy baby. It’s important to note that not all eggs are competent, and the incidence of irregular chromosome numbers (aneuploidy) increases with age.
- Meiosis and Fertilization: Following the initiation of the LH surge or the hCG trigger shot, the egg undergoes a process called meiosis, halving its chromosomes to 23. During this process, a structure called the polar body is expelled from the egg, while the remaining chromosomes are retained. The mature sperm, also undergoing meiosis, contributes 23 chromosomes. Fertilization occurs when these chromosomes combine, resulting in a euploid embryo with 46 chromosomes. Only euploid embryos are competent and capable of developing into healthy babies.
- The Significance of Embryo Ploidy: Embryo ploidy, referring to the numerical chromosomal integrity, is a critical factor in determining embryo competency. Aneuploid embryos, which have an irregular number of chromosomes, are often incompetent and unable to propagate healthy pregnancies. Failed nidation, miscarriages, and chromosomal birth defects can be linked to embryo ploidy issues. Both egg and sperm aneuploidy can contribute, but egg aneuploidy is usually the primary cause.
- Embryo Development and Competency: Embryos that develop too slowly or too quickly, have abnormal cell counts, contain debris or fragments, or fail to reach the blastocyst stage are often aneuploid and incompetent. Monitoring these developmental aspects can provide valuable insights into embryo competency.
- Diminished Ovarian Reserve (DOR): As women advance in their reproductive age, the number of remaining eggs in the ovaries decreases. Diminished ovarian reserve (DOR) occurs when the egg count falls below a certain threshold, making it more challenging to respond to fertility drugs effectively. This condition is often indicated by specific hormone levels, such as elevated FSH and decreased AMH. DOR can affect women over 40, but it can also occur in younger
Why IVF should be regarded as treatment of choice for older women an those who have diminished ovarian reserve ( DOR):
Understanding the following factors will go a long way in helping you to make an informed decision and thereby improve the chances of a successful IVF outcome.
- Age and Ovarian Reserve: Chronological age plays a vital role in determining the quality of eggs and embryos. As women age, there is an increased risk of aneuploidy (abnormal chromosome numbers) in eggs and embryos, leading to reduced competency. Additionally, women with declining ovarian reserve (DOR), regardless of their age, are more likely to have aneuploid eggs/embryos. Therefore, it is crucial to address age-related factors and ovarian reserve to enhance IVF success.
- Excessive Luteinizing Hormone (LH) and Testosterone Effects: In women with DOR, their ovaries and developing eggs are susceptible to the adverse effects of excessive LH, which stimulates the overproduction of male hormones like testosterone. While some testosterone promotes healthy follicle growth and egg development, an excess of testosterone has a negative impact. Therefore, in older women or those with DOR, ovarian stimulation protocols that down-regulate LH activity before starting gonadotropins are necessary to improve egg/embryo quality and IVF outcomes.
- Individualized Ovarian Stimulation Protocols: Although age is a significant factor in aneuploidy, it is possible to prevent further decline in egg/embryo competency by tailoring ovarian stimulation protocols. Here are my preferred protocols for women with relatively normal ovarian reserve:
- Conventional Long Pituitary Down Regulation Protocol:
- Begin birth control pills (BCP) early in the cycle for at least 10 days.
- Three days before stopping BCP, overlap with an agonist like Lupron for three days.
- Continue daily Lupron until menstruation begins.
- Conduct ultrasound and blood estradiol measurements to assess ovarian status.
- Administer FSH-dominant gonadotropin along with Menopur for stimulation.
- Monitor follicle development through ultrasound and blood estradiol measurements.
- Trigger egg maturation using hCG injection, followed by egg retrieval.
- Agonist/Antagonist Conversion Protocol (A/ACP):
- Similar to the conventional long down regulation protocol but replace the agonist with a GnRH antagonist from the onset of post-BCP menstruation until the trigger day.
- Consider adding supplementary human growth hormone (HGH) for women with DOR.
- Consider using “priming” with estrogen prior to gonadotropin administration
- Protocols to Avoid for Older Women or Those with DOR: Certain ovarian stimulation protocols may not be suitable for older women or those with declining ovarian reserve:
- Microdose agonist “flare” protocols
- High dosages of LH-containing fertility drugs such as Menopur
- Testosterone-based supplementation
- DHEA supplementation
- Clomiphene citrate or Letrozole
- Low-dosage hCG triggering or agonist triggering for women with DOR
Preimplantation Genetic Screening/Testing(PGS/T): PGS/T is a valuable tool for identifying chromosomal abnormalities in eggs and embryos. By selecting the most competent (euploid) embryos, PGS/T significantly improves the success of IVF, especially in older women or those with DOR.
Understanding the impact of advancing age and declining ovarian reserve on IVF outcomes is essential when making decisions about fertility treatments. Age-related factors can affect egg quality and increase the likelihood of aneuploid embryos with resultant IVF failure. Diminished ovarian reserve (DOR) further complicates the process. By considering these factors, you can make informed choices and work closely with fertility specialists to optimize your chances of success. Remember, knowledge is power, and being aware of these aspects empowers you to take control of your reproductive journey
If you would like to discuss with me, please email my assistant, Patti at concierge@sherivf.com
Geoffrey Sher MD
Heavy bleeding after possible implantations
Name: Megan M
Hi,
I’ve had two egg collections resulting in 5 embryos (3 of which didn’t survive thawing) and 3 on the second round.
In my first fresh embryo transfer I passed a couple of large blood clots the day after transfer, with no heavy bleeding and a negative result. I was told this could likely be low progesterone levels so in the following frozen transfer had two Crinone gels and a lubion injection daily. I had no symptoms or bleeding and a negative result.
In the second fresh embryo transfer at a different clinic I took two cyclogest pessaries and a lubion injection daily. I had light pink/brown spotting and cramps after a few days which I took to be implantation (I had been pregnant naturally before but had a miscarriage at 5 weeks and this felt similar) this lasted a couple of days then tailed off. After another couple of days I had heavy bleeding with large clots.
I was told by the clinic they didn’t know why this would happen as my progesterone levels were 396, and that in the next frozen cycle the gradual increase of eostrogen should make it less likely to happen again. I have just had this transfer on a modified natural cycle, with no medicated eostrogen and two cyclogest pessaries daily and a lubion injection every 3 days. Again, I had light pink spotting and cramps a few days later, 4/5 post transfer, this tailed off and a couple of days later I had bright red spotting. I continued taking the progesterone as instructed by the clinic but this spotting has continued until today, 11 days post transfer. I’ve taken an early pregnancy test every day for the last few days with negative results. I forgot to take my cyclogest pessary last night, took the next one on time this morning, but am now having severe cramps and the bleeding is now heavier.
I want to understand why this keeps happening when our embryos are top grade and my progesterone levels are so high. I’ve been told that even if the IVF is unsuccessful I shouldn’t be having this bleeding during treatment.
I’ve been told I have adenomyosis and a fibroid but this is localised and away from the womb cavity so shouldn’t be affecting implantation. I’ve read that embryo development can fail due to chromosomal issues. My husband had leukemia as a young child and I’ve read it could have long term negative impacts on sperm, but we haven’t had any detailed tests on his sperm other than the standard tests in the UK. Could this be causing the bleeding? What can we do in our next cycle to prevent this happening again?
Author
- IMPLANTATION DYSFUNCTION
Implantation dysfunction is often overlooked as a significant reason for IVF failure. This is especially true when IVF failure is unexplained, or when there are recurring pregnancy losses or underlying issues with the uterus, such as endo-uterine surface lesions, thin uterine lining (endometrium), or immunological factors.
IVF success rates have been improving in the past decade. Currently, in the United States, the average live birth rate per embryo transfer for women under 40 years old using their own eggs is about 2:5 per woman undergoing embryo transfer. However, there is a wide range of success rates among different IVF programs, varying from 20% to almost 50%. Based on these statistics, most women in the United States need to undergo two or more IVF-embryo transfer attempts to have a baby. Many IVF practitioners in the United States attribute the differences in success rates to variations in expertise among embryology laboratories, but this is not entirely accurate. Other factors, such as differences in patient selection, the failure to develop personalized protocols for ovarian stimulation, and the neglect of infectious, anatomical, and immunological factors that affect embryo implantation, are equally important.
Approximately 80% of IVF failures occur due to “embryo incompetency,” mainly caused by ( irregularities in chromosome number (aneuploidy), which is often related to the advancing age of the woman, diminished ovarian reserve ( DOR) but can also be influenced by the ovarian stimulation protocol chosen, and sperm dysfunction (male infertility). However, in around 20% of cases with dysfunction, failure is caused by problems with embryo implantation.
This section will focus on embryo implantation dysfunction and IVF failure which in the vast majority of cases is caused by:
- Anatomical irregularities of the inner uterine surface:
-
- Surface lesions such as polyps/fibroids/ scar tissue
- endometrial thickness
- Immunologic Implantation Dysfunction ( IID)lesions
-
- Autoimmune IID
- Alloimmune IID
- ANATOMICAL IMPLANTATION DYSFUNCTION
- a) Surface lesions such as polyps/fibroids/ scar tissue
When there are problems with the structure of the uterus, it can lead to difficulties in getting pregnant. While uterine fibroids usually don’t cause infertility, they can affect fertility when they distort the uterine cavity or protrude through the lining. Even small fibroids located just beneath the lining and protruding into the cavity can decrease the chances of the embryo attaching. Multiple fibroids within the uterine wall that encroach upon the cavity can disrupt blood flow, impair estrogen delivery, and prevent proper thickening of the lining. These issues can be identified through ultrasound during the menstrual cycle’s proliferative phase. Any lesion on the uterine surface, such as submucous fibroids, adhesions, endometrial polyps, or placental polyps, can interfere with implantation by causing a local inflammatory response similar to the effect of an intrauterine contraceptive device (IUD).
Clearly, even small uterine lesions can have a negative impact on implantation. Considering the high costs and emotional toll associated with in vitro fertilization (IVF) and related procedures, it is reasonable to perform diagnostic tests like hysterosalpingography (HSG), fluid ultrasound examination (hysterosonogram), or hysteroscopy before starting IVF. Uterine lesions that can affect implantation often require surgical intervention. In most cases, procedures like dilatation and curettage (D&C) or hysteroscopic resection are sufficient. Rarely a laparotomy may be needed. Such interventions often lead to an improvement in the response of the uterine lining.
Hysterosonogram( HSN/saline ultrasound) is a procedure where a sterile saline solution is injected into the uterus through the cervix using a catheter. Vaginal ultrasound is then used to examine the fluid-filled cavity for any irregularities that might indicate surface lesions like polyps, fibroid tumors, scarring, or a septum. When performed by an expert, HSN is highly effective in detecting even the smallest lesions and can supplant hysteroscopy in certain cases. HSN is less expensive, less invasive/traumatic, and equally effective as hysteroscopy. The only drawback is that if a lesion is found, hysteroscopy may still be needed for treatment.
Hysteroscopy is a diagnostic procedure performed in an office setting with minimal discomfort to the patient. It involves inserting a thin, lighted instrument called a hysteroscope through the vagina and cervix into the uterus to examine the uterine cavity. Normal saline is used to distend the uterus during the procedure. Like HSN, hysteroscopy allows for direct visualization of the inside of the uterus to identify defects that could interfere with implantation. We have observed that around one in eight IVF candidates have lesions that need attention before undergoing IVF to optimize the chances of success. I strongly recommend that all patients undergo therapeutic surgery, usually hysteroscopy, to correct any identified issues before proceeding with IVF. Depending on the severity and nature of the problem, hysteroscopy may require general anesthesia and should be performed in a surgical facility equipped for laparotomy if necessary.
- b) Thickness of the uterine lining (endometrium)
As far back as In 1989, I and my team made an important discovery about using ultrasound to assess the thickness of the endometrium during the late proliferative phase of both “ natural” and hormone-stimulated cycles. The assessment helped predict the chances of conception. We found that an ideal thickness of over 9mm at the time of ovulation , egg retrieval or with the commencement of progesterone therapy in embryo recipient cycles ( e.g., IVF with egg donation, gestational, surrogacy and embryo adoption) was associated with optimal implantation rates, while an endometrial thickness of less than 8 mm was associated with failure to implant or early pregnancy loss in the vast majority of cases. An endometrium measuring <8mm was almost invariably associated with failure to implant or early pregnancy loss in the while an endometrium measuring 8 to 9 mm was regarded as being intermediate, and while pregnancies did occur in this range, the rates were only slightly lower than with an optimal lining of 9 mm
A “poor” uterine lining typically occurs when the innermost layer of the endometrium (basal or germinal endometrium) is unable to respond to estrogen by developing a thick enough outer “functional” layer to support successful embryo implantation and placental development. The “functional” layer, which accounts for two-thirds of the total endometrial thickness, is shed during menstruation if pregnancy does not occur.
The main causes of a poor uterine lining are:
- Damage to the basal endometrium due to:
-
- Inflammation of the endometrium (endometritis), often resulting from retained products of conception after abortion, miscarriage, or childbirth.
- Surgical trauma caused by aggressive dilatation and curettage (D&C).
- Insensitivity of the basal endometrium to estrogen due to:
-
- Prolonged (back to back) use of clomiphene citrate for ovarian stimulation or…
- Prenatal exposure to diethylstilbestrol (DES), a drug given to prevent miscarriage in the 1960s.
- Overexposure of the uterine lining to male hormones produced by the ovaries or administered during ovarian stimulation (primarily testosterone):
-
- Older women, women with DOR (poor responders), and women with polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS) often have increased biological activity of luteinizing hormone (LH), leading to testosterone overproduction by the ovarian connective tissue (stroma/theca). This effect can be further amplified when certain ovarian stimulation protocols were high doses of menotropins ( e.g., Menopur) are used.
- Reduced blood flow to the basal endometrium caused by:
-
- Multiple uterine fibroids, especially if they are located beneath the endometrium (submucosal).
- Uterine adenomyosis, which involves extensive abnormal invasion of endometrial glands into the uterine muscle.
In 1996 I introduced the Vaginal administration of Sildenafil (Viagra) to improve endometrial thickening. The selective administration of Sildenafil has shown great promise in improving uterine blood flow and increasing endometrial thickening in cases of thin endometrial linings. When administered vaginally, it is quickly absorbed and reaches high concentrations in the uterine blood system, diluting as it enters the systemic circulation. This method has been found to have minimal systemic side effects. However, it is important to note that Viagra may not be effective in all cases, as some cases of thin uterine linings may involve permanent damage to the basal endometrium, rendering it unresponsive to estrogen.
Severe endometrial damage leading to poor responsiveness to estrogen can occur in various situations. These include post-pregnancy endometritis (inflammation after childbirth), chronic granulomatous inflammation caused by uterine tuberculosis (rare in the United States), and significant surgical injury to the basal endometrium (which can happen after aggressive D&C procedures).
- IMMUNOLOGIC IMPLANTATION DYSFUNCTION (IID)
There is a growing recognition that problems with the immune function in the uterus can lead to embryo implantation dysfunction. The failure of proper immunologic interaction during implantation has been implicated as a cause of recurrent miscarriage, late pregnancy fetal loss, IVF failure, and infertility. Some immunologic factors that may contribute to these issues include antiphospholipid antibodies (APA), antithyroid antibodies (ATA) , and activated natural killer cells (NKa).
- Activated natural Killer Cells (NKa):
During ovulation and early pregnancy, the uterine lining is frequented by NK cells and T-cells, which together make up more than 80% of the immune cells in the uterine lining. These cells travel from the bone marrow to the endometrium where they proliferate under hormonal regulation. When exposed to progesterone, they produce TH-1 and TH-2 cytokines. TH-2 cytokines help the trophoblast (embryo’s “root system”) to penetrate the uterine lining, while TH-1 cytokines induce apoptosis (cell suicide), limiting placental development to the inner part of the uterus. The balance between TH1 and TH-2 cytokines is crucial for optimal placental development. NK cells and T-cells contribute to cytokine production. Excessive TH-1 cytokine production is harmful to the trophoblast and endometrial cells, leading to programmed cell death and ultimately to implantation failure. Functional NK cells reach their highest concentration in the endometrium around 6-7days after ovulation or exposure to progesterone, which coincides with the time of embryo implantation. It’s important to note that measuring the concentration of blood NK cells doesn’t reflect NK cell activation (NKa). The activation of NK cells is what matters. In certain conditions like endometriosis, the blood concentration of NK cells may be below normal, but NK cell activation is significantly increased.
There are several laboratory methods to assess NK cell activation (cytotoxicity), including immunohistochemical assessment of uterine NK cells and measuring TH-1 cytokines in the uterus or blood. However, the K-562 target cell blood test remains the gold standard. In this test, NK cells isolated from a woman’s blood are incubated with specific “target cells,” and the percentage of killed target cells is quantified. More than 12% killing indicates a level of NK cell activation that usually requires treatment. Currently, there are only a few Reproductive Immunology Reference Laboratories in the USA capable of reliably performing the K-562 target cell test.
There is a common misconception that adding IL (intralipid) or Intravenous gammaglobulin (IVIg) to NK cells can immediately downregulate NK cell activity. However, neither IL and IVIg cannot significantly suppress already activated NK cells. They are believed to work by regulating NK cell progenitors, which then produce downregulated NK cells. To assess the therapeutic effect, IL/IVIg infusion should be done about 14 days before embryos are transferred to the uterus to ensure a sufficient number of normal functional NK cells are present at the implantation site during embryo transfer. Failure to recognize this reality has led to the erroneous demand from IVF doctors for Reproductive Immunology Reference Laboratories to report on NK cell activity before and immediately after exposure to IVIg or IL at different concentrations. However, since already activated NK cells cannot be deactivated in the laboratory, assessing NKa suppression in this way has little clinical benefit. Even if blood is drawn 10-14 days after IL/IVIg treatment, it would take another 10-14 days to receive the results, which would be too late to be practically advantageous.
- Antiphospholipid Antibodies:
Many women who struggle with IVF failure or recurrent pregnancy loss, as well as those with a personal or family history of autoimmune diseases like lupus erythematosus, rheumatoid arthritis, scleroderma, and dermatomyositis, often test positive for antiphospholipid antibodies (APAs). Over 30 years ago, I proposed a treatment for women with positive APA tests. This involved using a low dose of heparin to improve the success of IVF implantation and increase birth rates. Research indicated that heparin could prevent APAs from affecting the embryo’s “root system” ( the trophoblast), thus enhancing implantation. We later discovered that this therapy only benefits women whose APAs target specific phospholipids (phosphatidylethanolamine and phosphatidylserine). Nowadays, longer-acting low molecular weight heparinoids like Lovenox and Clexane have replaced heparin.
- Antithyroid Antibodies ( thyroid peroxidase -TPO and antithyroglobulin antibodies (TGa)
Between 2% and 5% of women of the childbearing age have reduced thyroid hormone activity (hypothyroidism). Women with hypothyroidism often manifest with reproductive failure i.e., infertility, unexplained (often repeated) IVF failure, or recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL). The condition is 5-10 times more common in women than in men. In most cases hypothyroidism is caused by damage to the thyroid gland resulting from thyroid autoimmunity (Hashimoto’s disease) caused by damage done to the thyroid gland by antithyroglobulin and antimicrosomal auto-antibodies. The increased prevalence of hypothyroidism and thyroid autoimmunity (TAI) in women is likely the result of a combination of genetic factors, estrogen-related effects, and chromosome X abnormalities. This having been said, there is significantly increased incidence of thyroid antibodies in non-pregnant women with a history of infertility and recurrent pregnancy loss and thyroid antibodies can be present asymptomatically in women without them manifesting with overt clinical or endocrinologic evidence of thyroid disease. In addition, these antibodies may persist in women who have suffered from hyper- or hypothyroidism even after normalization of their thyroid function by appropriate pharmacological treatment. The manifestations of reproductive dysfunction thus seem to be linked more to the presence of thyroid autoimmunity (TAI) than to clinical existence of hypothyroidism and treatment of the latter does not routinely result in a subsequent improvement in reproductive performance. It follows that if antithyroid autoantibodies are associated with reproductive dysfunction they may serve as useful markers for predicting poor outcome in patients undergoing assisted reproductive technologies. Some years back, I reported on the fact that 47% of women who harbor thyroid autoantibodies, regardless of the absence or presence of clinical hypothyroidism, have activated uterine natural killer cells (NKa) cells and cytotoxic lymphocytes (CTL) and that such women often present with reproductive dysfunction. We demonstrated that appropriate immunotherapy with IVIG or intralipid (IL) and steroids subsequently often results in a significant improvement in reproductive performance in such cases.
Almost 50% of women with antithyroid antibodies do not have activated cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTL) or natural killer cells (NK cells). This suggests that the antibodies themselves may not be the direct cause of reproductive dysfunction. Instead, the activation of CTL and NK cells, which occurs in about half of the cases with thyroid autoimmunity (TAI), is likely an accompanying phenomenon that damages the early “root system” (trophoblast) of the embryo during implantation.
Treating women who have both antithyroid antibodies and activated NK cells/CTL with intralipid (IL) and steroids improves their chances of successful reproduction. However, women with antithyroid antibodies who do not have activated NK cells/CTL do not require this treatment.
- Treatment Options for IID:
- Intralipid (IL) Therapy: IL is a mixture of soybean lipid droplets in water, primarily used for providing nutrition. When administered intravenously, IL supplies essential fatty acids that can activate certain receptors in NK cells, reducing their cytotoxic activity and enhancing implantation. IL, combined with corticosteroids, suppresses the overproduction of pro-inflammatory cytokines by NK cells, improving reproductive outcomes. IL is cost-effective and has fewer side effects compared to other treatments like IVIg.
- Intravenous immunoglobulin-G (IVIg) Therapy:In the past, IVIg was used to down-regulate activated NK cells. However, concerns about viral infections and the high cost led to a decline in its use. IVIg can be effective, but IL has become a more favorable and affordable alternative.
- Corticosteroid Therapy: Corticosteroids, such as prednisone and dexamethasone, are commonly used in IVF treatment. They have an immunomodulatory effect and reduce TH-1 cytokine production by CTL. When combined with IL or IVIg, corticosteroids enhance the implantation process. Treatment typically starts 10-14 days before embryo transfer and continues until the 10th week of pregnancy.
- Heparinoid Therapy: Low molecular weight heparin (Clexane, Lovenox)can improve IVF success rates in women with antiphospholipid antibodies (APAs) and may prevent pregnancy loss in certain thrombophilias when used during treatment. It is administered subcutaneously once daily from the start of ovarian stimulation.
- TH-1 Cytokine Blockers (Enbrel, Humira):TH-1 cytokine blockers have limited effectiveness in the IVF setting and, in my opinion, no compelling evidence supports their use. They may have a role in treating threatened miscarriage caused by CTL/NK cell activation, but not for IVF treatment. TH-1 cytokines are needed for cellular response, during the early phase of implantation, so completely blocking them could hinder normal implantation.
- Baby Aspirin and IVF:Baby aspirin doesn’t offer much value in treating implantation dysfunction (IID) and may even reduce the chance of success. This is because aspirin thins the blood and increases the risk of bleeding, which can complicate procedures like egg retrieval or embryo transfer during IVF, potentially compromising its success.
- Leukocyte Immunization Therapy (LIT):LIT involves injecting the male partner’s lymphocytes into the mother to improve the recognition of the embryo as “self” and prevent rejection. LIT can up-regulate Treg cells and down-regulate NK cell activation, improving the balance of TH-1 and TH-2 cells in the uterus. However, the same benefits can be achieved through IL (Intralipid) therapy combined with corticosteroids. IL is more cost-effective, and the use of LIT is prohibited by law in the USA.
Types of Immunologic Implantation Dysfunction (IID) and NK Cell Activation:
- Autoimmune Implantation Dysfunction: Women with a personal or family history of autoimmune conditions like Rheumatoid arthritis, Lupus Erythematosus, thyroid autoimmune disease (Hashimoto’s disease and thyrotoxicosis), and endometriosis (in about one-third of cases) may experience autoimmune IID. However, autoimmune IID can also occur without any personal or family history of autoimmune diseases. Treatment for NK cell activation in IVF cases complicated by autoimmune IID involves a combination of daily oral dexamethasone from the start of ovarian stimulation until the 10th week of pregnancy, along with 20% intralipid (IL) infusion 10 days to 2 weeks before embryo transfer. With this treatment, the chance of a viable pregnancy occurring within two completed embryo transfer attempts is approximately 70% for women <40 years old who have normal ovarian reserve.
- Alloimmune Implantation Dysfunction:NK cell activation occurs when the uterus is exposed to an embryo that shares certain genotypic (HLA/DQ alpha) similarities with the embryo recipient. Humans have 23 pairs of chromosomes: one set from the sperm and one set from the egg that created us. Our sixth pair of chromosomes each contain DQ alpha genes. Again, one of these genes is from the sperm and one is from the egg that created us.
Like the genes for eye color, DQ alpha/HLA gene combinations differ between people. Thus, the male (whose sperm created an embryo is likely to have different DQ alpha/HLA gene combinations than the potential mother . However, there are rare situations in which the male and the female partners have DQ-alpha/HLA gene combinations are the same.
The endometrial immune system is programmed to accept embryos with different DQ alpha/HLA gene combinations than its own. This is known as “alloimmune recognition.” So, if the man shares a similar DQ alpha/HLA gene combination with the woman, and his sperm creates an embryo that tries to implant , her endometrial immune system will see the embryo’s DQ alpha/HLA gene as “too similar” to its own and assume it is a foreign body.
Usually, this will lead to NK/T cell activation, the overproduction of TH-1 cytokines, and reproductive failure (i.e., infertility, and pregnancy loss). The severity with which this occurs is an important determinant of whether total implantation failure will occur or whether there would remain enough residual trophoblastic activity that would allow the pregnancy to limp along until the nutritional supply can no longer meet the demands of the pregnancy, at which point pregnancy loss occurs.
In cases of paternal-maternal DQ alpha/HLA matching, it will often take several pregnancies for NK cell activation to build to the point that women with alloimmune implantation dysfunction will present with clinical evidence of implantation dysfunction. Sometimes it starts off with one or two live births, whereupon NK/T cell activity starts to build, leading to one or more early miscarriages. Eventually the NK/T cell activation is so high that subsequent pregnancies can be lost before the woman is even aware that she was pregnant at all. At this point, she is often diagnosed with secondary, “unexplained” infertility and/or “unexplained” IVF failure.
Alloimmune Implantation Dysfunction is diagnosed by testing the blood of both the male and female partners for matching DQ alpha genes and NK/T cell activation.
There are two types of DQ alpha/HLA genetic matching:
- Partial DQ alpha/HLA genetic matching: Couples who share only one DQ alpha/HLA gene are considered to have a “partial match.” If NK cell activation is also present, this partial match puts the couple at a disadvantage for IVF success. However, it’s important to note that DQ alpha/HLA matching, whether partial or total, does not cause IID without associated NK cell activation. Treatment for partial DQ alpha/HLA match with NK cell activation involves IL infusion and oral prednisone as adjunct therapy. IL infusion is repeated every 2-4 weeks after pregnancy is confirmed and continued until the 24th week of gestation. In these cases, only one embryo is transferred at a time to minimize the risk of NK cell activation.
- Total (Complete) Alloimmune Genetic Matching:A total alloimmune match occurs when the husband’s DQ alpha genotype matches both that of the partner. Although rare, this total match along with NK cell activation significantly reduces the chance of a viable pregnancy resulting in a live birth at term. In some cases, the use of a gestational surrogate may be necessary.
It should be emphasized that poor embryo quality is not always the main cause of reproductive dysfunction and that the complex interaction between embryonic cells and the lining of the uterus plays a critical role in successful implantation. Women with personal or family histories of autoimmune disease or endometriosis and those with unexplained (often repeated) IVF failure or recurrent pregnancy loss, often have immunologic implantation dysfunction (IID as the underlying cause . For such women, it is important to understand how IID leads to reproductive failure and how selective treatment options such as intralipid (IL), corticosteroid and heparinoid therapy, can dramatically improve reproductive outcomes. Finally, there is real hope that proper identification and management of IID can significantly improve the chance of successful reproduction and ultimately contribute to better quality of life after birth.
If you would like to discuss with me, please email my assistant, Patti at concierge@sherivf.com
Geoffrey Sher MD