Can I please get clarification on what this means:

Churchill and Comstock (2017) conclude:” In our preliminary observations, the non-
receptive ERA group had similar live birth rates compared to the receptive ERA group. It appears the majority of the pregnancies conceived in the non-receptive group occurred during ovulatory cycles and thus a non-receptive ERA in a medicated cycle likely does not have prognostic value for ovulatory cycles.

About me… I have had numerous medicated ERA cycles that have come back as “proliferative” after the first came back as “pre-receptive”, which apparently nobody has ever seen before. I’m currently waiting on the results of my ERA tests in a natural cycle and was just curious as to the article above and whether that relates to my medical anomaly case over the past year.

Thank you for your time.